Duron v. Berryhill
Court Docket Sheet
|Last full docket sheet refresh: 350 days ago. Refresh now|
Civil Cover Sheet
Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Text entry; no document attached.)
ORDER granting  Motion for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident) Attorney.
NOTICE of Appearance by Richard L. Pomeroy on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill
SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: Agency record due 60 days after defendant's initial appearance. Opening brief due 30 days after agency record is filed. Answering brief due 30 days after opening brief is filed. Reply brief is due 14 days after Defendant's brief. Signed by Judge H. Russel Holland on 8/1/17.
Docket Annotation: For the purpose of tracking the briefing as ordered at docket 7, when filing the Opening Brief the attorney shall file the document using the event Motion Miscellaneous Relief and text in the relief being sought. Responsive filings should be filed using the event Response in Opposition to Motion or Response to Motion (Non-Opposition). The reply, if any, shall be filed using the event Reply to Response to Motion. (Text entry; no document attached.)
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Deidre Leanora Duron. Nancy A. Berryhill served on 7/26/2017, answer due 9/25/2017.
NOTICE of Appearance by Kathryn Ann Miller on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill
ANSWER to  Complaint by Nancy A. Berryhill.
MOTION to Remand to Social Security by Deidre Leanora Duron.
NOTICE of Substitution by Nancy A. Berryhill
RESPONSE in Opposition re  MOTION to Remand to Social Security filed by Nancy A. Berryhill.
Appellant's REPLY BRIEF by Deidre Leanora Duron.
ORDER granting  Motion to Remand. This matter is remanded for further proceedings. Signed by Judge H. Russel Holland on 2/14/18.
JUDGMENT: The Commissioner's decision is reversed and this matter is remanded back to the SSA for further proceedings. Signed by Judge H. Russel Holland on 2/28/18. (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/6/2018: # (1) Judgment with attorney fees and costs (redistrubuted))
Response in Opposition to Motion
Order on Motion for Attorney Fees
Would you like this case removed from DocketBird? Request removal.