Abdullah v. Plant City Police Department et al

Middle District of Florida, flmd-8:2016-cv-01182

ORDER denying {{39}} construed Motion for Reconsideration filed by Al-Rashid Muhammad Abdullah. Signed by Judge James D. Whittemore on 10/5/2017. (AEN)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

PageID 302 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION AL - RASHID MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH, Plaintiff, Case No: 8: 16 - cv - 1182 - T - 27JSS CITY OF PLANT CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al ., Defendants. ORDER ne BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff's Affidavit of Facts in Support of Reconsideration to Make Additional Factual Findings - Objecting to Order of Dismissal (Dkt. 39), which is construed as a motion. Reconsideration is justified only by (1) an intervening change in controlling law, (2) new evidence, and / or (3) clear error or manifest injustice. Del. Valley Floral Group, Inc. v. Shaw Rose Nets, LLC, 597 F. 3d 1374, 1383 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (quoting Degirmenci v. Sapphire - Ft. Lauderdale, LLLP, 642 F. Supp. 2d 1344, 1353 (S. D. Fla. 2009)); Davis v. Daniels, 655 F. App ' x 755, 759 (11th Cir. 2016) (per curiam); Fenello v. Bank of Am ., NA, 577 Fed. App ' x 899, 903 n. 7 (11th Cir. 2014) . And " [ a ] motion for reconsideration should not be used as a vehicle. . . to reiterate arguments previously made, ? " Del. Valley, 597 F. 3d at 1384 (citation omitted), or to reargue matters already addressed, Arthur v. King, 500 F. 3d 1335, 1343 (11th Cir. 2007) . Plaintiff has not demonstrated any persuasive grounds to reconsider. Accordingly, the construed motion is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 5 day of October, 2017. rec Vittura JAMES D. WHITTEMORE United States District Judge Copies to: Pro Se Plaintiff, Counsel of Record Furthermore, Plaintiff's construed motion does not include a memorandum of legal authority and therefore fails to comply with Local Rule 3. 01 (a) .