Alexander v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-03225

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting {{22}} Stipulation Continuing CMC date

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

I OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 2 VICTORIA R. NUETZEL (SBN 115124) 300 Lakeside Drive, 23'd Floor 3 Oakland, CA 94612-3534 Telephone: (51 0) 464-6023 4 Facsimile: (510) 464-6049 Email: vnuetze@BART.gov 5 Attorneys for Defendant 6 San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 12 MICHAEL ALEXANDER, an individual) Case No. C 15-03225 HSG c=~~ =cc -- -- c =·=·-_:=~=·----:-_-::::~-_:--=----_--.::=----~ c_-_-::-":c-- --- --- --- ------:- --_:-::_:-c~c=--c~'c-:-·_y=--=- __ _ __ ____ __ ___ _ 13 Plaintiff,)) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 14 v.) ORDER CONTIUING CASE MAN-) AGEMENT CONFERENCE 15 BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, a) public entity in California,) 16) Defendant.) 17) 18 19 WHEREAS, On or about October 2, 2015, this Court determined that this case was related 20 to Jerry Ho v. BART, UDSC, Northern District, Action No. 15-1128 and ordered that the matter 21 be reassigned to the Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam; 22 WHEREAS, as a result of that reassignment the Case Management Conference previously 23 set for October 16,2015, was rescheduled for October 20, 2015; 24 WHEREAS, Counsel for Defendant BART is currently scheduled to attend an out of town 25 seminar on the date currently set for the Case Management Conference and, because she is the only 26 attorney assigned to this mater, no other attorney can appear in her place; 27 II 74675v1 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C 15-03225 HSG 1 1 WHEREAS, this is the first Case Management Conference for this matter, and there have 2 been no prior requests to have the matter rescheduled; and 3 WHEREAS, the Parties have filed a joint Case Management Conference Statement and 4 there are no major issue which require immediate judicial resolution. 5 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate as follows: 6 The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for October20, 2015 may be 7 continued to October 2ih at 2:00 or the next available Case Management Conference date. 8 9 Dated: October 13, 2015 Law Offices of John Ota 10 By: Is/ John Ota u-----------~_:___Jol:rn. (J 11 12 ------ 13 Dated: October 13, 2015 ===== Law Office of Glicel S1.lrnagiiysay · 14 By: /s/Glicel Sumagaysay 15 Glicel Sumagaysay 16 17 Dated: October 13,2015 Office ofthe General Counsel San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District 18 19 By: Is/ Victoria Nuetzel Victoria R. Nuetzel 20 Attomey for Defendant San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District 21 22 ATTESTATION 23 I, Victoria Nuetzel, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained 24 from each of the other signatories. 25 Is/ Victoria R. Nuetzel 26 27 74675v1 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C 15-03225 HSG 2 I ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Case Management 3 October Conference currently scheduled for October 20,2015 be continued to _ _ _ _27, _ _2015 _ _ _.at 4 2:00in Courtroom 15 5 6 14 2015 Dated: October_, 7 8 Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, JR. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - · · - · · - - - - - · - 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 74675v1 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C I 5-03225 HSG 3