Alexander v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-03225

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 24, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL ALEXANDER, CASE NO. 15 - cv - 03225 - MMC Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, Defendant. Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L. R. 16 - 8 and ADR L. R. 3 - 5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non - binding Arbitration (ADR L. R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L. R. 5) X Mediation (ADR L. R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16 - 8 and ADR L. R. 3 - 5) . Private Process: o Private ADR (please identify process and provider) . The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: X the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered .) her requested deadline Dated: 9 | 21115 Date: apaļfo uta RO Attorney Nr Defendant CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [ PROPOSED ] ORDER The parties ' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties ' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 24, 2015 Mafine M. Cherry UNITED STATES JUDGE When filing this document in ECF. please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e. g ., " Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation. " Rey. 12 / 11 Page 2 of 2