American Patents LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. et al

Western District of Texas, txwd-6:2018-cv-00339

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Megan Alter Hudgeons Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice of Doyle B. Johnson (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-11723765) by on behalf of Qualcomm Incorporated, Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION AMERICAN PATENTS LLC VS. Case No .: 6: 18 - cv - 00339 - ADA MEDIATEK, INC ., ET AL. MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Comes now Doyle B. Johnson, applicant herein, and moves this Court to grant admission to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas pro hac vice to represent Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm in this case, and Technologies, Inc would respectfully show the Court as follows:: 1. Applicant is an attorney and a member of the law firm (or practices under the name of) Reed Smith LLP with offices at: Mailing address. 101 Second Street, Suite 1800 City, State. Zip Code: San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415 - 543 - 8700 Facsimile: 415 - 391 - 8269 12 / 13 / 95 Since, Applicant has been and presently is a member of and in good standing with the Bar of the State of Ca Applicant's bar license number is 180348 3. Applicant has been admitted to practice before the following courts: Court: Admission date: See attachment Applicant is presently a member in good standing of the bars of the courts listed above, except as provided below (list any court named in the preceding paragraph before which Applicant is no longer admitted to practice): N / A 5. I have X have not previously applied to Appear Pro Hac Vice in this district court in Case [ s ]: Number: on the day of Number: _ _ on the _ _ _ _ day of Number: _ _ on the _ _ _ day of _ _ Applicant has never been subject to grievance proceedings or involuntary removal proceedings while a member of the bar of any state or federal court, except as provided: N / A 7. Applicant has not been charged, arrested, or convicted of a criminal offense or offenses, except as provided below (omit minor traffic offenses): N / A 8. Applicant has read and is familiar with the Local Rules of the Western District of Texas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . and will comply with the standards of practice set out therein. 9. Applicant will file an Application for Admission to Practice before the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, if so requested; or Applicant has co - counsel in this case who is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Co - counsel: Jeff Layne, Texas Bar No. 00791083 Mailing address: Reed Smith LLP, 111 Congress Avenue, Suite 400 City, State, Zip Code: Austin, TX 78701 Telephone: 512 - 623 - 1821 Should the Court grant applicant's motion, Applicant shall tender the amount of $ 100. 00 pro hac vice fee in compliance with Local Court Rule AT - 1 (f) (2) [ checks made payable to: Clerk,U.S. District Court) . Wherefore, Applicant prays that this Court enter an order permitting the admission of Doyle B. Johnson to the Western District of Texas pro hac vice for this case only. Respectfully submitted, Doyle B. Johnson [ printed name of Applicant ] Dalib bel [ signature of Applicant ] CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have served a true and correct copy of this motion upon each attorney of record and the original upon the Clerk of Court on this the 5th day of February, 2019 Doyle B. Johnson [ printed name of Applicant ] [ signature of Applicant ] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION CASE NO. 6: 18 - cv - 00339 - ADA MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE FOR DOYLE B. JOHNSON ATTACHMENT 3. Applicant has been admitted to practice in the following courts: United States District Courts for the Northern District of California, February 16, 2001 United States District Courts for the Central District of California, December 13, 1995 United States District Courts for the Southern District of California, October 24, 2006 California Supreme Court, December 13, 1995 United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, April 27, 2001 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, March 19, 2001