Anaya v. Pandell et al

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-02012

ORDER re {{9}} MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by Jane C. Pandell. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 06/05/2015. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EDWARD M. ANAYA, 7 Case No. 15-cv-02012-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION 9 FOR EXTENSION OF TIME JANE C. PANDELL, et al., 10 Re: Dkt. No. 9 Defendants. 11 12 The court has reviewed Defendant Jane Curran Pandell's motion for an extension of time Northern District of California United States District Court 13 to respond to Plaintiff Edward M. Anaya's complaint and request to shorten time on the motion. 14 [Docket No. 9.] The court will treat Defendant's motion as a motion for administrative relief 15 pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11. Any opposition by Plaintiff is due by no later than 5:00 16 p.m. on June 5, 2015. Defendant's request to shorten time on the motion is denied as moot. The 17 court will rule on the motion on June 8, 2015, in conformance with the local rules. ISTRIC ES D 18 T TC 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. TA O S U ED RT 20 Dated: June 5, 2015 E RED O ORD UNIT IT IS S ______________________________________ 21 Donna M. Ryu R NIA 22 United States Magistrate Judge M. Ryu NO onna Judge D FO 23 RT LI 24 ER H A N C 25 D IS T IC T OF R 26 27 28