Arkema Inc. v. Bulk Resources, Inc.

Middle District of Florida, flmd-8:2017-cv-00057

ORDER ATTACHED denying {{30}} Arkema, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Indemnification-Related Counterclaims. Arkema shall file its answer and defenses to counts I and III of the counterclaim within fourteen (14) days. Signed by Judge Richard A. Lazzara on 6/1/2017. (CCB)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

PageID 368 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ARKEMA, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-defendant, v. CASE NO. 8:17-cv-57-T-26AEP BULK RESOURCES, INC., Defendant/Counter-claimant. / ORDER UPON DUE AND CAREFUL CONSIDERATION of the parties' submissions, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Arkema's Motion to Dismiss Bulk Resources' Indemnification-Related Counterclaims (Dkt. 30) is denied. After review of the relevant cases cited by the parties, including the ones issued by this Court in this and other cases, together with the allegations of counts I and III of Bulk Resources' counterclaim, the Court agrees with Bulk Resources' contention that within the context of a contractual claim for indemnification there is a universe of difference between whether a claim for such indemnification is ripe for a decision and whether the filing of a such a claim for indemnification is premature. The Court agrees in that regard with Judge Moody's decision in BP Prods. N. Am., Inc. v. Giant Oil, Inc., 545 F. Supp. 2d 1257, 1260 (M.D. Fla. 2008) that "contractual indemnity actions can be filed prior to judgment in the underlying action." (Citations omitted.) Arkema shall file its answer and PageID 369 defenses to counts I and III of Bulk Resources' counterclaim within fourteen (14) days of this order. DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, on June 1, 2017. s/Richard A. Lazzara RICHARD A. LAZZARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE COPIES FURNISHED TO: Counsel of Record -2-