Baldwin et al v. Colley et al

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-02762

ORDER re {{33}} STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Parties to file required declaration within 7 days. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 03/15/2016. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MALAD BALDWIN, et al., 7 Case No. 15-cv-02762-KAW Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED 9 PROTECTIVE ORDER JAMES COLLEY, et al., 10 Re: Dkt. No. 33 Defendants. 11 12 Northern District of California United States District Court 13 On March 8, 2016, the parties filed a proposed stipulated protective order. They did not, 14 however, indicate whether they were using a model protective order or a modified protective order 15 as required by the Court's Standing Order. (See Judge Westmore's General Standing Order ¶ 11.) 16 Accordingly, the parties are ordered to submit, within 7 days of this order, (a) a declaration 17 stating that the proposed order is identical to one of the model orders, (b) a declaration explaining 18 each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed 19 protective order with the model order, available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/model- 20 protective-orders, or (c) a declaration explaining why use of one of the model orders is not 21 practicable. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: 03/15/16 __________________________________ 24 KANDIS A. WESTMORE 25 United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28