Blackman-Baham v. Zinke

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01922

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSE TO {{33}} MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LATE OPPOSITION. Opposition is due 8/11/2016. No reply in support of the motion for permission shall be filed. In its order ruling on the motion for permission to file a late opposition, the Court shall set a further schedule, as appropriate at that time. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/8/2016.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 UNITED D STATES D DISTRICT C COURT 5 NORTHER RN DISTRIC CT OF CALIIFORNIA 6 7 SH HEILA BLA ACKMAN-B BAHAM, Case No. 115-cv-019222-JSW Plaintiff, 8 ORDER S SETTING SCHEDULE E FOR v. RESPONSSE TO MOTTION FOR R 9 PERMISS SION TO FIILE LATE 10 SA ALLY JEWE ELL, OPPOSIT TION Defendant.. Re: Dkt. N No. 33 11 12 Northern District of California United States District Court 13 The Co ourt has receiived Plaintifff's motion ffor permissioon to file a laate oppositioon to the 14 mo otion to dism miss (Dkt. No o. 33), accom mpanied by tthe proposedd late opposiition (Dkt. N No. 34). The 15 Court STRIKE ES the schedu ule for respo onse to the m motion for peermission thaat was autom matically 16 gen nerated by th he Court's ellectronic filing system annd entered aas part of doccket entry 333, and SETS S 17 thee following schedule. s 18 The opp position to th he motion fo or permissionn to file a laate oppositionn is due on A August 11, 19 201 16. No reply y in support of the motio on for permi ssion shall bbe filed. Seee generally N N.D. Cal. 20 Civ vil. L.R. 7-11. 21 In its orrder ruling on o the motion n for permission to file a late opposiition, the Coourt shall set 22 a fu urther sched dule, as appro opriate at thaat time. 23 IT IS SO S ORDER RED. 24 Daated: August 8, 2016 25 26 JE EFFREY S. W WHITE 27 Unnited States D District Judgge 28