Brahler v. Kraft Heinz Food Company

Northern District of Illinois, ilnd-1:2016-cv-06161

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of Illinois. MDL No. 2705. [Transferred from California Eastern on 6/15/2016.]

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

Case: 1:16-cv-06161 Document #: 17 Filed: 06/14/16 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:104 Case MDL No. 2705 Document 151 Filed 06/13/16 Page 1 of 3 Judge: Gary Feinerman Magistrate: Mary M. Rowland Filed: 6/13/2016 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL Case#'s: 16cv6158 CAC, 16cv6159 CAC, on 16cv6160 CAE, 16cv6161 CAE, 16cv6162 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION CAN, 16cv6163 CAN, 16cv6164 FLM, 16cv6165 FLS, 16cv6166 FLS, 16cv6168 FLS, 16cv6169 MA, 16cv6170 MA, 16cv6171 MN, 16cv6172 MOE, 16cv6173 NYE, 16cv6174 NYE, 16cv6175 OHN, 16cv6176 OHN, 16cv6177 PAE, IN RE: 100% GRATED PARMESAN CHEESE MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION MDL No. 2705 16cv6178 PAE, 16cv6179 PAM, 16cv6181 PAW, 16cv6182 PAW, 16cv6183 TXS (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) mr CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −1) On June 2, 2016, the Panel transferred 14 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See _F.Supp.3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Illinois. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Gary Feinerman. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Illinois and assigned to Judge Feinerman. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Illinois for the reasons stated in the order of June 2, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Gary Feinerman. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: A TRUE COPY-ATTEST Jun 13, 2016 Jeffery N. Lüthi THOMAS G. BRUTON, CLERK Clerk of the Panel - By: s/ MELISSA RIVERA DEPUTY CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS - June 14, 2016 Case: 1:16-cv-06161 Document #: 17 Filed: 06/14/16 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:105 Case MDL No. 2705 Document 151 Filed 06/13/16 Page 2 of 3 IN RE: 100% GRATED PARMESAN CHEESE MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION MDL No. 2705 SCHEDULE CTO−1 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 2 16−02455 Michael Ambers v. Kraft Heinz Company 16cv6158 CAC 2 16−03345 David Greenstein v. Kraft Heinz CompanyOpposed 6/6/2016 CAC 8 16−00605 Adam Weiss et al v. The Kraft Heinz Company 16cv6159 CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE 1 16−00400 Lewis v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company 16cv6160 CAE 2 16−00849 Brahler v. Kraft Heinz Food Company 16cv6161 CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 16−01552 Agles v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company 16cv6162 CAN 3 16−01616 Mattley v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company 16cv6163 CAN 3 16−02753 Rebekah Prewitt et al v. Safeway Inc. Opposed 6/9/2016 FLORIDA MIDDLE FLM 8 16−00515 Franklin v. Wal−Mart Stores, Inc. et al 16cv6164 FLORIDA SOUTHERN FLS 0 16−60624 SELLERS v. KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY, 16cv6165 FLS 9 16−80382 Cruz v. WalMart Store, Inc. 16cv6166 FLS 9 16−80511 Randolph v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company 16cv6168 MASSACHUSETTS MA 1 16−10553 SIMS v. ALBERTSONS, LLC et al 16cv6169 MA 1 16−10586 Saitta, v. Target Corporation 16cv6170 MINNESOTA MN 0 16−00686 Hara et al v. Target Corporation et al 16cv6171 Case MDL No. Document Case: 1:16-cv-06161 2705 Document 151 06/14/16 #: 17 Filed: Filed 06/13/16 Page Page 3 of 3 of 3 #:106 3 PageID MISSOURI EASTERN MOE 4 16−00369 Zachary v. Target Corporation 16cv6172 NEW YORK EASTERN NYE 1 16−01529 Campana v. Kraft Heinz Food Company 16cv6173 NYE 2 16−01162 Costoso v. Wal−Mart Stores, Inc. 16cv6174 OHIO NORTHERN OHN 1 16−00535 Davies v. Wal−Mart Stores, Inc. 16cv6175 OHN 3 16−00536 Lee v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company 16cv6176 PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN PAE 2 16−01135 JONES v. WAL−MART STORES, INC. 16cv6177 PAE 2 16−01136 ELLISON v. KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY 16cv6178 PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE PAM 1 16−00475 Bundy v. Target Corporation 16cv6179 PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN PAW 2 16−00328 HACKMAN v. KRAFT HEINZ FOOD COMPANY 16cv6181 PAW 2 16−00398 FORD v. KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY 16cv6182 TEXAS SOUTHERN TXS 4 16−00612 Manfredi v. Walmart Stores Inc 16cv6183