Bumble Trading, Inc. et al v. Match Group LLC

Western District of Texas, txwd-6:2018-cv-00350

ORDER DENYING GRANTING [69] Motion to Dismiss; [33] Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ; DENYING [33] Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; DENYING [59] Motion for Leave to File; DENYING [20] Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; DENYING [23] Motion to Dismiss Signed by Judge Alan D Albright.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

Fl LED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAR 05 2O9 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAJK u.s. DISTRJOJRI WACO DIVISION BUMBLE TRADING INC. and BUMBLE § HOLDING, LTD § § Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, No. 6: 18-cv-00350-ADA § V. § MATCH GROUP, LLC Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. § [I) 1 U Before the Court is Match Group, LLC's and Bumble Trading Inc. and Bumble Holding, Ltd.'s Joint Motion to Dismiss. After considering the motion, the Court concludes that the motion should be and is hereby GRANTED. Bumble Trading Inc. and Bumble Holding, Ltd.'s claims in this matter are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Match Group, LLC's counterclaims 1-6 in this matter are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Match Group, LLC's counterclaims 7-1 1 in this matter are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The dismissal of Bumble Trading Inc. and Bumble Holding, Ltd.'s claims does not preclude or affect Bumble Trading, Inc. and Bumble Holding, Ltd.'s ability to raise the allegations and claims set forth in Dkt. 59-1 of this matter. 1 The dismissal of Match Group, LLC's counterclaims does not preclude or affect Match Group, LLC from raising all defenses (including affirmative defenses) to the allegations and claims alleged in Dkt. 59-1 of this matter, or any other defenses (including affirmative defenses) to any distinct allegations or claims Bumble Trading Inc., Bumble Holding, Ltd., or any related or affiliated company may raise in the future. Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 [Dkt. 23] is DENIED as moot. Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [Dkt. 33] is DENIED as moot. Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File to File Petition in State Court [Dkt. 59] is DENIED as moot. All relief not granted in this 18-cv- 350 matter is DENIED. This is a final judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED this day of Yr&, Honorable Alan D. Aibright) United States District Judge 2