Bynum v. Colvin

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-02222

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO ADVISE COURT WHETHER HE CONSENTS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 5/29/15.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 HENRY A. BYNUM, 10 Plaintiff, No. C 15-02222 JSW 11 v. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF United States District Court TO ADVISE COURT WHETHER For the Northern District of California 12 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, HE CONSENTS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL 13 Defendant. PURPOSES / 14 15 In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to 16 reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final 17 judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). Defendant has filed a notice of consent. (Docket No. 8.) 18 The Court HEREBY DIRECTS Plaintiff to advise the Court, by no later than June 26, 2015, 19 whether he is willing to consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in 20 the instant action.1 For the Plaintiff's convenience, consent forms are available at 21 http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the "Forms" section. The parties are further advised that they 22 may jointly request assignment to a specific magistrate judge. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: May 29, 2015 JEFFREY S. WHITE 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the Court in their joint 1 case management statement filed in connection with a case management conference. Because the instant action involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case management conference has not been scheduled.