Carlton v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

District of Nebraska, ned-8:2005-cv-00293

ORDER denying as moot {{133}} Motion for Judgment; denying as moot {{135}} Motion for Attorney Fees. Ordered by Judge Karen E. Schreier.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

8:05-cv-00293-KES-TDT Doc # 140 Filed: 05/09/07 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 1585 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DAVID CARLTON,) 8:05CV293) Plaintiff,)) vs.) ORDER) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD) COMPANY,)) Defendant.) Pending before the court are defendant's renewal of motion for judgment as a matter of law and plaintiff's motion for attorney fees. A Satisfaction of Judgment was entered in this case on April 16, 2007. It is hereby ORDERED that defendant's renewal of motion for judgment as a matter of law (Docket 133) is denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for attorney fees (Docket 135) is denied as moot. Dated May 9, 2007. BY THE COURT: /s/ Karen E. Schreier KAREN E. SCHREIER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE