Center For Food Safety et al v. Vilsack et al

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01590

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting {{65}} Stipulation on Joint Proposed Briefing Schedule. Motion due by 1/20/2017.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, et al.,) Case No. 3:15-cv-1590-HSG 10) Plaintiffs,) 11 ORDER ON JOINT PROPOSED v.) BRIEFING SCHEDULE 12) TOM VILSACK, et al.,) 13) Defendants.) 14 15 16 PURSUANT TO STPIULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 17 The following schedule governs the production of the Administrative Record in this case: 18 Defendants' production of the Administrative Record On or before December 5, 2016 19 20 Plaintiffs' motion to challenge the completeness of On or before January 20, the Administrative Record, if any 2017 21 22 Should Plaintiffs decide to file a motion to challenge the completeness of the Administrative 23 Record, Civil Local Rule 7 should govern the form, length, and timing of the motion, as well as 24 any opposition, and reply associated with that motion. 25 If there are no issues regarding the scope of the Administrative Record and no motion 26 practice regarding the scope of the Administrative Record is necessary, the following briefing 27 schedule will govern the cross-motions for summary judgment in this case: 28 CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01590-HSG 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment On or before February 1 20, 2017 2 Defendants' opposition and cross-motion for On or before March 23, 3 summary judgment 2017 4 Plaintiffs' opposition and reply On or before April 6, 2017 5 Defendants' reply On or before April 20, 2017 6 7 For Defendants' opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment, Defendants may 8 file a consolidated brief not to exceed fifty (50) pages. For Plaintiffs' opposition and reply, 9 Plaintiffs may file a consolidated brief not to exceed forty (40) pages. 10 If Plaintiffs file a motion to challenge the completeness of the Administrative Record on 11 or before January 20, 2016, the above briefing schedule for cross-motions for summary judgment 12 will be suspended, and the parties shall submit a new briefing schedule for cross-motions for 13 summary judgment within seven days of the Court's ruling on Plaintiffs' motion challenging the 14 completeness of the Administrative Record. 15 16 Dated: November 3, 2016 _____________________________ Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 17 U.S. District Court Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01590-HSG 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE