Electrical Industry Service Bureau, Inc., et al v. J Copello International Corp. D/b/a Copello Electric Co.

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01946

ORDER GRANTING {{22}} STIPULATION to Continue Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/14/15.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

Case Case4:15-cv-01946-JSW 4:15-cv-01946-JSW Document Document22 23 Filed Filed09/11/15 09/14/15 Page1 Page 1ofof43 Benjamin K. Lunch, State Bar No. 246015 1 Wan Yan Ling, State Bar No. 297029 NEYHART, ANDERSON, FLYNN & GROSBOLL 2 369 Pine Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94104 3 Tel. (415) 677-9440 Fax (415) 677-9445 4 Email: blunch@neyhartlaw.com wling@neyhartlaw.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 Patricia Walsh, State Bar No. 121098 7 LEONIDOU & ROSIN 8 777 Cuesta Drive, Suite 200 Mountain View, CA 94040 9 Tel. (650) 691-2888 Fax (650) 691-2889 10 Email: pwalsh@alr-law.com 11 Attorneys for Defendants 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 (Oakland Division) 15 16 17 ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY SERVICE Case No. 15-CV-1946-JSW BUREAU, INC., et al. 18 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Plaintiffs, v. TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 19 CONFERENCE 20 J COPELLLO INTERNATIONAL CORP. d/b/a COPELLO ELECTRIC CO. 21 Defendant. 22 ______________________________________ 23 24 25 26 27 NEYHART, 28 ANDERSON, -1- FLYNN & STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE GROSBOLL Case No. 15-CV-1946-JSW ATTORNEYS AT LAW Case Case4:15-cv-01946-JSW 4:15-cv-01946-JSW Document Document22 23 Filed Filed09/11/15 09/14/15 Page2 Page 2ofof43 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE 1 2 MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 3 Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, the parties through undersigned counsel hereby 4 stipulate and respectfully request that the Court continue the Initial Case Management 5 Conference scheduled for September 18, 2015 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland 6 Courthouse. The parties declare in support of this request: 7 WHEREAS, on April 29, 2015, Plaintiffs filed this Complaint against Defendant (Dckt. 8 No. 1); 9 10 WHEREAS, on June 2, 2015, a copy of the Summons and Complaint was served on 11 Defendant, as evidenced by the Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint filed with this 12 Court (Dckt. No. 12); 13 WHEREAS, service having been completed and the answer period having elapsed without 14 an answer or other responsive pleading filed with the Court, Plaintiffs requested that the Court 15 enter default on July 6, 2015 (Dckt. No. 13); 16 17 WHEREAS, on July 7, 2015, default was entered against Defendant (Dckt. No. 14); 18 WHEREAS, on July 23, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Case Management Statement advising the 19 Court of Plaintiffs' intent to file a Motion for Default Judgment (Dckt. No. 15); 20 WHEREAS, on July 27, 2015, the Court issued an Order Continuing the Initial Case 21 Management Conference to September 18, 2015 (Dckt. No. 16); 22 WHEREAS, on August 20, 2015, Defendant filed a Motion to Set Aside Default (Dckt. 23 No. 17); 24 25 WHEREAS, on September 1, 2015, Plaintiffs filed an Opposition to Defendant's Motion 26 to Set Aside Default (Dckt. No. 19); 27 NEYHART, 28 ANDERSON, -2- FLYNN & STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE GROSBOLL Case No. 15-CV-1946-JSW ATTORNEYS AT LAW Case Case4:15-cv-01946-JSW 4:15-cv-01946-JSW Document Document22 23 Filed Filed09/11/15 09/14/15 Page3 Page 3ofof43 WHEREAS, on September 10, 2015, Defendant filed a Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to 1 2 Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Default (Dckt. No. 20); 3 WHEREAS, the Motion Hearing is set for October 2, 2015 at 9:00 AM (Dckt. No. 18); 4 WHEREAS, in light of the pending Motion Hearing, both parties believe it would be 5 premature for the Initial Case Management Conference to be held on September 18, 2015; 6 THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, the parties though their respective 7 attorneys stipulate as follows: 8 The parties respectfully request that the Court continue the Initial Case Management 9 10 Conference till after the Motion Hearing has been held on October 2, 2015, and the Court has 11 made a decision on said Motion. 12 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 14 Dated: September 10, 2015 By: /s/ Wan Yan Ling 15 WAN YAN LING Attorney for Plaintiffs 16 Neyhart, Anderson, Flynn & Grosboll 17 18 Dated: September 11, 2015 By: /s/ Patricia Walsh PATRICIA WALSH 19 Attorney for Defendant Leonidou & Rosin 20 21 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 The case management conference is continued pending the court's ruling on the motion to set aside default and shall be re-set, as necessary, upon disposition of that motion. 23 Dated: September 14, 2015 _______________________ 24 Hon. Jeffrey S. White 25 United States District Judge 26 27 NEYHART, 28 ANDERSON, -3- FLYNN & STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE GROSBOLL Case No. 15-CV-1946-JSW ATTORNEYS AT LAW