Esswein v. Starbucks Corporation

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01422

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 6/30/15.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL ESSWEIN, 7 Case No. 15-cv-01422-JSW Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND 9 PRETRIAL MATTERS STARBUCKS CORPORATION, 10 Defendant. 11 12 Northern District of California United States District Court 13 Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case 14 Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further 15 ORDERED that: 16 A. DATES 17 Jury Trial Date: Monday, September 12, 2016, at 8:00 a.m., 5 days 18 Jury Selection: September 7, 2016 at 8:00 a.m. 19 Pretrial Conference: Monday, August 22, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. 20 Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, June 17, 2016, 9:00 A.M. 21 Last Day for Expert Discovery: April 29, 2016 22 Last Day for Expert Disclosure: April 13, 2016 23 Close of Non-expert Discovery: February 17, 2016 24 B. DISCOVERY 25 The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to 26 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses 27 pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of non- 28 expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all 1 supplementation has been completed. 2 D. PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER 3 No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its 4 own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b) 5 without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline 6 contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties may 7 not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the date of 8 this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to a change 9 in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule that the Court 10 will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are specifically set 11 by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain leave of Court. 12 Northern District of California United States District Court 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: June 30, 2015 15 ______________________________________ 16 JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2