Federal Trade Commission v. Directv, Inc. et al

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01129

ORDER to file chart. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. (hsglc3S, COURT STAFF)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 7 Case No. 15-cv-01129-HSG Plaintiff, 8 ORDER TO FILE JOINTLY v. PREPARED CHART REGARDING 9 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO DIRECTV, INC., et al., FILE UNDER SEAL 10 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 177, 184, 187-88, 190-91, 193- 11 95, 197, 199 12 Northern District of California The Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") and DIRECTV have fully briefed the FTC's United States District Court 13 motion for partial summary judgment, which is currently pending before the Court. See Dkt. No. 14 176 (original motion); Dkt. No. 183 (corrected motion); Dkt. No. 189 (opposition to motion); Dkt. 15 No. 196 (reply). The parties have filed administrative motions (including a supplemental 16 administrative motion) seeking sealing of these briefs and attached exhibits, as well as corrections 17 and oppositions to the administrative motions. See Dkt. Nos. 177, 184, 187-88, 190-91, 193-95, 18 197 & 199. This slew of filings has resulted in a muddy record of exactly what each party is 19 seeking to seal, what sealing each party opposes, and the bases for each party's positions. 20 The Court hereby ORDERS the parties to file, no later than Tuesday, November 22, 2016, 21 at 5:00pm, a jointly prepared chart that succinctly summarizes the documents sought to be sealed 22 and the positions of the parties as to each. Specifically, each row of the chart should list the 23 following information: (1) document sought to be sealed (e.g., "Opposition"); (2) docket number 24 of redacted version of the document; (3) docket number of unredacted version of document; (4) 25 pin citation of portion of document that is sought to be sealed (e.g., "7:15-8:5"); (5) party seeking 26 sealing (e.g., "DIRECTV"); (6) asserted grounds for sealing (e.g., "Divulges DIRECTV's trade 27 secrets."); (7) party opposing sealing (e.g., "FTC"); and, (8) asserted grounds for opposition (e.g., 28 1 "DIRECTV previously disclosed this information to the public."). Each of the numbered 2 categories above should be a separate column of the chart. If the parties seek to seal multiple 3 portions of the same document, each portion should be listed as a separate row in the chart. And 4 as illustrated by the examples above, the asserted grounds for sealing or opposition should be 5 expressed in a concise sentence. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: 8 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 9 United States District Judge 10 11 12 Northern District of California United States District Court 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2