Ferguson v. Acura

Middle District of Florida, flmd-8:2016-cv-03460

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re {{44}} Defendant's Case Management Report and {{43}} Plaintiff's Objections to Case Management Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. McCoun III on 7/3/2017. (AHA)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

PageID 184 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION HELEN FERGUSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:16-cv-3460-T-23TBM GETTEL ACURA, Defendant. / REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THIS CAUSE is before the Court sua sponte to address scheduling and case management matters. Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, has filed an objection to Defendant's proposed Case Management Report. (Doc. 43). Defendant has filed its Case Management Report, along with email correspondence between the parties. (Doc. 44). Upon review of the respective submissions, the Court recommends that a Case Management and Scheduling Order be entered in accordance with the following proposed schedule: 1. If the parties have not already done so, Initial Disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A) shall be exchanged on or before July 14, 2017. 2. Third party claims and joinder motions shall be filed on or before October 9, 2017. 3. Plaintiff's expert disclosure pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) shall be made on or before October 9, 2017. Defendant's expert disclosure pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) shall be made on or before October 30, 2017. PageID 185 4. All discovery shall be conducted so as to be completed on or before December 11, 2017. 5. Mediation shall be conducted on or before January 8, 2018. 6. Dispositive and Daubert motions shall be filed on or before January 22, 2018. 7. The Final Pretrial Conference shall be scheduled on or after April 9, 2018, with the trial date on the May 2018 trial calendar. Respectfully submitted this 3rd day of July 2017. NOTICE TO PARTIES A party has fourteen (14) days from this date to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation's factual findings and legal conclusions. A party's failure to file written objections waives that party's right to challenge on appeal any unobjected-to factual finding or legal conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and Recommendation. See 11th Cir. R. 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Copies furnished to: Steven D. Merryday, Chief United States District Judge Pro se Plaintiff Counsel of record 2