Greenfield v. Criterion Capital Management, LLC et al

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-03583

ORDER re {{32}} MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 11/20/2015. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STACEY GREENFIELD, Case No. 15-cv-3583-PJH 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. ORDER 10 CRITERION CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Northern District of California United States District Court 13 14 On November 19, 2015, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, 15 noticed for hearing on January 20, 2016. The court previously approved a stipulated 16 briefing schedule that set the date for the filing of the opposition and reply on December 17 23, 2015, and January 14, 2015, respectively. While the approved stipulation also 18 provided for a hearing date "no earlier than January 20, 2016," six days is an insufficient 19 amount of time for the court to review the parties' papers and prepare for the hearing. 20 The Civil Local Rules of this court provide for a minimum of 14 days between the filing of 21 the reply brief and the hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-2. Accordingly, defendants shall renotice 22 the hearing for a date no earlier than February 3, 2016. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: November 20, 2015 26 __________________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON 27 United States District Judge 28