Heldt v. Tata Consultancy Services, LTD

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01696

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying {{524}} Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 BRIAN BUCHANAN, ET AL., CASE NO. 15-cv-01696-YGR 7 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' 8 vs. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 9 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, LTD, Re: Dkt. No. 524 10 Defendant. 11 12 Having considered Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (Dkt. No. 524), Northern District of California United States District Court 13 the Court finds that good cause does not exist to seal the materials at issue. 14 The Court hereby DENIES the motion as follows: 15 Document or Portion of Evidence Offered in Support Order 16 Document Sought to be of Sealing 17 Sealed Exhibit A to Plaintiffs' None - Designated DENIED. 18 Motion in Limine No. 7 Confidential by Defendant Tata Consultancy Services, 19 Ltd., which has not filed a supporting declaration as 20 required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1). 21 Exhibit B to Plaintiffs' None - Designated DENIED. Motion in Limine No. 7 Confidential by Defendant 22 Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd., which has not filed a 23 supporting declaration as 24 required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1). Exhibit C to Plaintiffs' None - Designated DENIED. 25 Motion in Limine No. 7 Confidential by Defendant Tata Consultancy Services, 26 Ltd., which has not filed a supporting declaration as 27 required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1). 28 Exhibit A to Plaintiffs' None - Designated DENIED. 1 Motion in Limine No. 8 Confidential by Defendant 2 Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd., which has not filed a 3 supporting declaration as required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1). 4 Exhibit D to Plaintiffs' None - Designated DENIED. Motion in Limine No. 8 Confidential by Defendant 5 Tata Consultancy Services, 6 Ltd., which has not filed a supporting declaration as 7 required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1). Exhibit E to Plaintiffs' None - Designated DENIED. 8 Motion in Limine No. 8 Confidential by Defendant 9 Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd., which has not filed a 10 supporting declaration as required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1). 11 12 This Order terminates Docket Number 524. Northern District of California United States District Court 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: October 15, 2018 15 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2