Ho v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01128

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting {{16}} Stipulation selecting Early Neutral Evaluation

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Jerry Ho et. a!. CASE NO. C-15-01128 HSG Plaintiff(s), v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORbER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Defendant(s).. l .. ------------------~ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: D Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) X Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. S) D Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) ' ----(Note: Parties whooelieve that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than.any other form ofADR must participate in an ADR phone col'!forence and may not file this form. They must insteadfile a Notice ofNeed for ADR Phone Conforence. See Civil Local Rule 16-BandADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: D Private ADR (please identify process and provider) - - - - - - - - - The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: X the presumptive deadlinl) (The deadline is 90 days from the date ofthe order referring the case to ari ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) D other requested d e a d l i n e - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: May 21,2015 Dated: May 21, 2015 CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED) ORDER D X The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. D The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 5/28/2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation." Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of2