Integris Wealth Management, LLC v. Integris Asset Management, LLC

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-03142

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; EXTENDING TIME TO SERVE; AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TO PLAINTIFF. Case Management Statement due by 3/11/2016. Show Cause Response due by 12/4/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/18/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 11/9/15. Modified on 11/10/2015

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 INTEGRIS WEALTH MANAGEMENT, 7 LLC, Case No. 15-cv-03142-JSW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER CONTINUING CASE 9 v. MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, EXTENDNG TIME TO SERVE AND 10 INTEGRIS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TO PLAINTIFF 11 Defendant. 12 Northern District of California United States District Court 13 14 On September 24, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiff's request to continue the initial case 15 management conference, on the basis that the defendant had not yet been served. In that Order, 16 the Court noted that the deadline for service, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 17 4(m), was November 4, 2015. The Court also stated that if Plaintiff believed additional time 18 would be required to effect service, it would be required to file a motion for extension of time to 19 serve by October 9, 2015. Plaintiff did not file a motion on that date. 20 Plaintiff did not comply with the deadline set forth by the Court in its previous Order. 21 Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not impose 22 sanctions in the amount of $250.00 for failure to comply with that deadline. Plaintiff's response to 23 this Order to Show Cause shall be due by December 4, 2015. If Plaintiff fails to file a timely 24 response, the Court shall impose the monetary sanctions without further notice to Plaintiff. 25 On November 4, 2015, the last day to effect service, Plaintiff filed a second administrative 26 motion to continue the case management conference. Plaintiff asks for a continuance on the basis 27 it still has not served the defendant. Although Plaintiff did not file a motion to extend time for 28 service, it has set forth facts in the case management statement that show it has been diligent in its 1 effforts to servee defendant and a that show w good causse to extend tthe time to sserve defenddant. 2 Acccordingly, th he Court GR RANTS Plain ntiff a furtheer 120 days, from the datte of this Orrder, to servee 3 deffendant. If Plaintiff P has not served defendant d byy February 55, 2016, andd requires addditional timee 4 to serve, s Plainttiff shall file a motion to extend timee to serve byy February 112, 2016. Iff Plaintiff 5 faills to comply y with this deeadline, the Court C shall iissue a furtheer order to show cause aas to why 6 san nctions shoulld not be imp posed, which may includde monetaryy sanctions oor an order too show 7 cau use why the case should not be dism missed for fai lure to servee. 8 Finally,, the Court GRANTS G thee request to continue thee case managgement confference. Thee 9 casse managemeent conferen nce scheduled for Novem mber 13, 20115, is CONT TINUED to M March 18, 10 201 16 at 11:00 a.m. a The paarties' joint case c managem ment statem ment shall be due on Marrch 11, 2016. 11 IT IS SO S ORDER RED. 12 Daated: Novemb ber 9, 2015 Northern District of California United States District Court 13 14 ___________________________ JE EFFREY S. W WHITE 15 Unnited States D District Judgge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2