Ixi Mobile (R&D) Ltd. et al v. Apple, Inc.

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-03755

ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's letter, dated February 24, 2015, requesting leave to file a sur-reply to Apple's reply brief. (Doc. No. 37, No. 14-cv-7954 (RJS).) The Court also is in receipt of Defendant Apple Inc.'s letter, dated February 24, 2015, responding to Plaintiff's letter and requesting "that IXI be required to provide the Court with the [IXI License Agreement]." (Doc. No. 38, No. 14-cv-7954 (RJS).) Because the Court finds that limited supplemental briefing as to whether IXI Mobile (R&D), Inc. lacks standing to be a Plaintiff in these actions would be helpful, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff's request for leave to file a sur-reply is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall limit the sur-reply to three pages and submit the sur-reply by March 2, 2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Defendant Apple Inc.'s request "to respond to any new facts, evidence, or arguments introduced in the sur-reply" is GRANTED. Defendant Apple Inc. shall limit its response to three pages and submit the response by March 5, 2015. Finally, because the Court also finds that its review of the license referenced in the parties' briefing and letters would help the Court resolve the motion to transfer these actions to the Northern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Defendant Apple Inc.'s request "that IXI be required to provide the Court with the license" is GRANTED. (Responses due by 3/5/2015, Surreplies due by 3/2/2015.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 2/25/2015)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK USDS SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: DATE FILED: 22515 IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD. and IXI IP LLC, Plaintiffs, -V- SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., No. 14-cv-4355 (RJS) ORDER Defendants. IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD. and IXI IP LLC, Plaintiffs, -V- No. 14-cv-4428 (RJS) ORDER BLACKBERRY LIMITED and BLACKBERRY CORPORATION, Defendants. IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD. and IXI IP LLC, Plaintiffs, -V- No. 14-cv-7954 (RIS) ORDER APPLE INC., Defendant. RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's letter, dated February 24, 2015, requesting leave to file a sur-reply to Apple's reply brief. (Doc. No. 37, No. 14-cv-7954 (RJS).). The Court also is in receipt of Defendant Apple Inc.'s letter, dated February 24, 2015, responding to Plaintiffs letter and requesting "that IXI be required to provide the Court with the [IXI License Agreement]." (Doc. No. 38, No. 14-cv-7954 (RJS).) Because the Court finds that limited supplemental briefing as to whether IXI Mobile (R&D), Inc. lacks standing to be a Plaintiff in these actions would be helpful, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff's request for leave to file a sur- reply is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall limit the sur-reply to three pages and submit the sur-reply by March 2, 2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Defendant Apple Inc.'s request "to respond to any new facts, evidence, or arguments introduced in the sur-reply" is GRANTED. Defendant Apple Inc. shall limit its response to three pages and submit the response by March 5, 2015. Finally, because the Court also finds that its review of the license referenced in the parties' briefing and letters would help the Court resolve the motion to transfer these actions to the Northern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Defendant Apple Inc.'s request "that IXI be required to provide the Court with the license" is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 25, 2015 New York, New York hree RICHARD J. SULLIVAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE