Ixi Mobile (R&D) Ltd. et al v. Apple, Inc.

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-03755

ORDER: This Addendum is an integral part of the Order of today's date granting confidentiality protection to certain materials. Notwithstanding any other provision, no document may be filed with the Clerk under seal without a further Order of this Court addressing the specific documents to be sealed. Any application to seal shall be accompanied by an affidavit or affidavits and a memorandum of law, demonstrating that the standards for sealing have been met and specifically addressing Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006) and any other controlling authority. Nothing herein is intended to alter or modify the applicability of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 to this case. The redactions expressly authorized by Rule 5.2 may be made without further application to the Court. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 4/14/2015)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK USDS SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY PLED DOC DATE HLED: 4-T-5 IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD. and IXI IP LLC, Plaintiffs, No. 14-cv-4355 (RJS) ORDER SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD. and IXI IP LLC, Plaintiffs, No. 14-cv-4428 (RJS) ORDER BLACKBERRY LIMITED and BLACKBERRY CORPORATION, Defendants. IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD. and IXI IP LLC, Plaintiffs, No. 14-cv-7954 (RJS) ORDER APPLE INC., Defendant RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge: This Addendum is an integral part of the Order of today's date granting confidentiality protection to certain materials. Notwithstanding any other provision, no document may be filed with the Clerk under seal without a further Order of this Court addressing the specific documents to be sealed. Any application to seal shall be accompanied by an affidavit or affidavits and a memorandum of law, demonstrating that the standards for sealing have been met and specifically addressing Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006) and any other controlling authority. Nothing herein is intended to alter or modify the applicability of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 to this case. The redactions expressly authorized by Rule 5.2 may be made without further application to the Court. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 14, 2015 New York, New York Rule RICHARD J. SULLIVAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE