Ixi Mobile (R&D) Ltd. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-03752

Exhibit 1 - Proposed Objection

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

Exhibit 1 1 Jason D. Cassady (pro hac vice) jcassady@caldwellcc.com 2 Hamad M. Hamad (pro hac vice) 3 hhamad@caldwellcc.com Robert Seth Reich, Jr. (pro hac vice) 4 sreich@caldwellcc.com CALDWELL CASSADY & CURRY P.C. 5 2101 Cedar Springs Rd. Ste. 1000 Dallas, TX 75201 6 Telephone: (214) 888-4848 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD. and IXI IP, LLC 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD. et al., CASE NO. 4:15-CV-03752-HSG 13 Plaintiffs, OBJECTION TO DEFENDANTS' 14 STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION 15 v. Date: May 9, 2019 16 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ET AL., Time: 2:00 p.m. Courtroom: 2, 4th Floor 17 Defendants. Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 18 IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD. et al., 19 CASE NO. 4:15-CV-03755-HSG (Related Case) 20 Plaintiffs, 21 v. 22 APPLE INC., Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 Case No. 4:15-CV-03752-03755-HSG OBJECTION TO DEFENDANTS' STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION 31 1 Defendants' filing at Dkt. No. 177 purports to be a Statement of Recent Decision under Local 2 Rule 7-3(d)(2). However, this filing does not comport with Local Rule 7-3(d)(2) because it is not a 3 "relevant" judicial opinion. In particular, the decision attached to the filing concerns the application of 4 issue preclusion (also known as collateral estoppel). However, Defendants did not raise or argue issue 5 preclusion; rather, Defendants only argued claim preclusion (also known as res judicata). These are 6 different doctrines with different requirements, scopes, and effects. Accordingly, Plaintiffs object to this 7 filing and request that it be disregarded as improper new argument and supplementary material that was 8 9 filed without prior Court approval as required by Local Rule 7-3(d). 10 Plaintiffs are prepared to submit additional briefing on this issue should the Court request it. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:15-CV-03752-03755-HSG 30 OBJECTION TO DEFENDANTS' STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION 1 31 1 Dated: May 2, 2019 CALDWELL CASSADY & CURRY P.C. 2 By:/s/ Jason D. Cassady Jason D. Cassady (pro hac vice) 3 jcassady@caldwellcc.com Hamad M. Hamad (pro hac vice) 4 hhamad@caldwellcc.com 5 Robert Seth Reich, Jr. (pro hac vice) sreich@caldwellcc.com 6 CALDWELL CASSADY & CURRY P.C. 2101 Cedar Springs Rd. Ste. 1000 7 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 888-4848 8 9 John V. Picone III, Bar No. 187226 jpicone@hopkinscarley.com 10 Jennifer S. Coleman, Bar No. 213210 jcoleman@hopkinscarley.com 11 HOPKINS & CARLEY 12 A Law Corporation The Letitia Building 13 70 South First Street San Jose, CA 95113-2406 14 mailing address: 15 P.O. Box 1469 16 San Jose, CA 95109-1469 Telephone: (408) 286-9800 17 Facsimile: (408) 998-4790 18 Thomas Biemer (pro hac vice) tbiemer@dilworthlaw.com 19 John J. Higson (pro hac vice) jhigson@dilworthlaw.com 20 Joshua Wolson (pro hac vice) 21 jwolson@dilworthlaw.com DILWORTH PAXSON LLP 22 1500 Market Street, Ste. 3500(E) Philadelphia, PA 19106 23 24 Attorneys for Plaintiffs IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD. and IXI IP, LLC 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:15-CV-03752-03755-HSG 30 OBJECTION TO DEFENDANTS' STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION 2 31