James Corbel et al v. 21st Century Oncology of California et al

Middle District of Florida, flmd-8:2016-cv-02920

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART {{22}} MOTION FOR EXTENSION.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) [Transferred from cand on 10/13/2016.]

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

PageID 1407 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 JAMES CORBEL and ROXANNE No. C 16-02944 WHA 11 HAATVEDT, individually and on behalf of United States District Court a class of similarly-situated individuals, For the Northern District of California 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 13 AND DENYING IN PART v. MOTION FOR EXTENSION 14 21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY OF 15 CALIFORNIA, A MEDICAL CORPORATION; 21ST CENTURY 16 ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 17 Defendant. 18 / 19 The Court is in receipt of defendants' motion for an extension to respond to plaintiffs' 20 complaint until thirty days after a ruling on the motion to transfer. Defendants' deadline for 21 responding to plaintiffs' complaint is on August 2, 2016. This motion should have been made 22 sooner. Regardless of whether the case is transferred, defendants will eventually need to 23 respond to plaintiffs' complaint. There will be no waste in beginning that work. Given that the 24 deadline is in less than a week, however, this order grants an additional two weeks for 25 defendants to respond to plaintiffs' complaint. It is unwarranted to postpone work that will 26 27 28 PageID 1408 1 eventually need to be done. Defendants shall therefore respond to plaintiffs' complaint by 2 August 15, 2016. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: July 28, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2