Joyce Harper et al v. The Law Office of Harris and Zide LLP

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01114

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting {{24}} Stipulation selecting Mediation.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Joyce Harper, et. al.,, CASE NO. ______________________ Case3:15-cv-01114-HSG Plaintiff(s), v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] The Law Office of Harris and ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Zide LLP,, Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 ✔ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ✔9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) 9 other requested deadline _____________________________________________ Dated:___________ May 20, 2015 ____________________________ /s/ Aaron D. Radbil Attorney for Plaintiff Dated:____________ May 20, 2015 ____________________________ /s/ Renee C. Ohlendorf Attorney for Defendant CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED] ORDER 9✔ The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 5/28/2015 __________________________________ DISTRICT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation." Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2 E-FILER'S ATTESTATION I obtained the concurrence of Ms. Ohlendorf to file the foregoing. /s/ Aaron D. Radbil Aaron D. Radbil