Lawman v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01202

ORDER to Submit Further Information re Plaintiff's Police Practices Expert. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 07/28/2016. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GARY RICHARD LAWMAN, 7 Case No. 15-cv-01202-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SUBMIT FURTHER 9 INFORMATION RE PLAINTIFF'S CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN POLICE PRACTICES EXPERT 10 FRANCISCO, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 The reports of Plaintiff's police practices expert, David Dusenbury, contain many Northern District of California United States District Court 13 references to Office of Citizen Complaints ("OCC") materials. However, in Plaintiff's motion in 14 limine no. 6, Plaintiff takes the position that Dusenbury's reliance on the OCC materials will be 15 limited "to the extent [the materials] reveal that the SFPD either failed to advise the complainant 16 he could arrange for blood-alcohol testing, or that requests to arrange for such tests were 17 repeatedly refused by the SFPD, despite a stated SFPD policy to facilitate those tests when 18 requested." See Docket No. 137 at 2. Therefore, by no later than 12:00 p.m. on August 1, 2016, 19 Plaintiff shall file a letter to the court confirming that Dusenbury's testimony regarding the OCC 20 materials will be limited to the subject matter described above. He shall also confirm that Plaintiff 21 is withdrawing any other opinions by Dusenbury based on the OCC materials that are outside the scope of the subject matter described above. ISTRIC ES D 22 T TC 23 TA O S U ED IT IS SO ORDERED. RT 24 D RDERE UNIT OO IT IS S Dated: July 28, 2016 25 R NIA ______________________________________ 26 Donna M. Ryu u a M. RyJudge United States Magistrate NO o nn Judge D FO 27 RT LI 28 ER H A N C D IS T IC T OF R