Lawman v. City and County of San Francisco et al

SECOND ORDER to Submit Further Information re Plaintiff's Police Practices Expert. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 08/02/2016. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF)

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01202

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GARY RICHARD LAWMAN, 7 Case No. 15-cv-01202-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. SECOND ORDER TO SUBMIT 9 FURTHER INFORMATION RE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN PLAINTIFF'S POLICE PRACTICES 10 FRANCISCO, et al., EXPERT 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff's police practices expert, David Dusenbury, has offered four expert reports, dated Northern District of California United States District Court 13 March 21, 2016; April 4, 2016; May 2, 2016; and May 31, 2016. By no later than 10:00 a.m. on 14 August 3, 2016, Plaintiff shall file a letter to the court identifying all of the specific Dusenbury 15 opinions Plaintiff will offer at trial. Plaintiff shall identify all of the opinions he plans to offer by 16 opinion number and/or letter and page number in each of the four Dusenbury reports. Plaintiff 17 will not be permitted to offer at trial any opinions that he does not identify in his submission. 18 Additionally, in Plaintiff's motion in limine no. 6 and August 1, 2016 letter to the court, 19 Plaintiff asserts that Dusenbury will testify about a subset of OCC materials in connection with his 20 Monell claim. The court would like to review those specific OCC materials in advance of the 21 August 3, 2016 second pretrial conference. Since Defendants have offered some OCC materials as trial exhibits, in the same letter to the court due by 10:00 a.m. on August 3, 2016, Plaintiff shall 22 identify which, if any, of Defendants' proposed exhibits contain the OCC materials on which 23 Plaintiff will rely. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: August 2, 2016 26 ______________________________________ 27 Donna M. Ryu United States Magistrate Judge 28