Lightfoot, et al v. DC, et al

District of Columbia, dcd-1:2001-cv-01484

ORDER denying {{237}} Jamal Rashad's Motion to Compel Reinstatement of Benefits, granting nunc pro tunc {{251}} Motion to Enlarge time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, denying {{258}} Jamal Rashad's Motion to Compel Discovery and Purported Class List, granting nunc pro tunc {{265}} Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Leave to File Surreply. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 12/30/05. (lcjf1,)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELIZABETH LIGHTFOOT et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civ. A. No. 01-1484 (CKK/JMF) THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al., Defendants. ORDER In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is, hereby, ORDERED that 1. Defendants' Motion to Enlarge Nunc Pro Tunc the Time in Which to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel [#251] is GRANTED nunc pro tunc; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that 2. Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Leave to File Surreply in Opposition to Jamal Rashad's Motion to Compel Service of Discovery [#265] is GRANTED nunc pro tunc; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that 3. Class Representative Jamal Rashad's Motion to Compel Reinstatement of Compensation Benefits [#237] is DENIED; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that 4. Class Representative Jamal Rashad's Motion to Compel Discovery and Purported Class List [#258] is DENIED. SO ORDERED. ___________________________ JOHN M. FACCIOLA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: 2