Luque v. City of Richmond et al

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-02625

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/22/15.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HUMBERTO SEPULVEDA LUQUE, 7 Case No. 15-cv-02625-JSW Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND 9 PRETRIAL MATTERS CITY OF RICHMOND, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 Northern District of California United States District Court 13 Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case 14 Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further 15 ORDERED that: 16 A. DATES 17 Jury Trial Date: Monday, September 19, 2016, at 8:00 a.m., 10 days 18 Jury Selection: September 14, 2016, at 8:00 a.m. 19 Pretrial Conference: Monday, August 29, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. 20 Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, June 24, 2016, 9:00 A.M. 21 Last Day for Expert Discovery: May 6, 2026 22 Last Day for Expert Disclosure: April 22, 2016 23 Close of Non-expert Discovery: March 25, 2016 24 B. DISCOVERY 25 The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to 26 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses 27 pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of non- 28 expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all 1 supplementation has been completed. 2 C. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 3 This matter is referred for assignment to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero to conduct a 4 settlement conference to be completed by December 18, 2015. Counsel will be contacted by that 5 judge's chambers with a date and time for the conference. 6 D. PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER 7 No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its 8 own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b) 9 without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline 10 contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties may 11 not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the date of 12 Northern District of California this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to a change United States District Court 13 in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule that the Court 14 will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are specifically set 15 by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain leave of Court. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: September 22, 2015 19 ______________________________________ 20 JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2