McEnroe v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-02190

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting {{77}} REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT LIMITED TO ISSUES STEMMING FROM CERTAIN DISCOVERY REQUESTS CONCERNING PLAINTIFF'S ALLEGED DAMAGES.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 Lisa C. Hamasaki (SBN 197628) lch@millerlawgroup.com 2 Shannon R. Clawson (SBN 273699) sclawson@millerlawgroup.com 3 MILLER LAW GROUP A Professional Corporation 4 111 Sutter Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94104 5 Tel. (415) 464-4300 Fax (415) 464-4336 6 Attorneys for Defendant 7 AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC 8 NEUMANN LAW 9 3558 ROUND BARN BLVD., SUITE 200 SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA 95403 (707) 636-4295 10 MICHELLE DYE NEUMANN (STATE BAR #303601) 11 GEARINGER LAW GROUP 740 FOURTH STREET 12 SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA 95404 (415) 440-3102 A P RO F E SSIO NAL C O RPO RATIO N 13 BRIAN GEARINGER (STATE BAR #146125) M ILLER L AW G ROUP 14 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF SARA MCENROE C ALIF O RNIA 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SARA McENROE, Case No.: C 15-02190 HSG (SK) 18 19 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE 20 v. FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT LIMITED TO ISSUES 21 STEMMING FROM CERTAIN DISCOVERY AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC, and DOES REQUESTS CONCERNING PLAINTIFF'S 22 1 through 20, inclusive, ALLEGED DAMAGES 23 Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Defendants. 24 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102 25 Complaint filed: April 14, 2015 26 Trial Date: January 23, 2017 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND REQUEST Case No.: C 15-02190 HSG (SK) 1 Plaintiff SARA MCENROE and Defendant AT&T Mobility Services LLC 2 ("Defendant" or "AT&T") (collectively, "the Parties"), through their counsel of record, filed a 3 stipulation and request for extension of the fact discovery deadline for Defendant, which 4 would be limited to issues stemming from certain discovery requests concerning Plaintiff's 5 alleged damages set forth in Defendant's Requests for Production, Set Two and 6 Interrogatories, Set Two. 7 8 After full consideration of the stipulation and request submitted by the parties, 9 the supporting declaration, and all other matters presented to this Court, and good cause 10 appearing therefore, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties' stipulation and request is 11 hereby GRANTED to allow time for Defendant to conduct discovery limited to issues that 12 stem from Plaintiff's responses to Defendant's Requests for Production, Set Two, and A P RO F E SSIO NAL C O RPO RATIO N 13 Interrogatories, Set Two, including depositions and written discovery, which the Parties M ILLER L AW G ROUP 14 understand shall be discovery related to Plaintiff's alleged damages for emotional distress C ALIF O RNIA 15 and alleged compensatory damages and mitigation efforts. The Court HEREBY ORDERS 16 THAT: 17 18  Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant's Requests for Production, Set Two, 19 and Interrogatories, Set Two, on or by July 1, 2016; 20  The fact discovery cut-off to conduct discovery on issues that stem from 21 Plaintiff's responses to Defendant's Requests for Production, Set Two, 22 and Interrogatories, Set Two, including depositions and written 23 discovery, which the Parties understand shall be discovery related to 24 Plaintiff's alleged damages for emotional distress and alleged 25 compensatory damages and mitigation efforts (e.g., depositions of 26 Plaintiff's health care providers and records from Plaintiff's subsequent 27 employers, if any) – and for this discovery only – shall be extended to 28 August 5, 2016; 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND REQUEST Case No.: C 15-02190 HSG (SK) 1  Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 37-3, no motion to compel fact discovery 2 by Defendant in relation to the above-discussed discovery may be filed 3 more than 7 days after the amended fact discovery cut-off of August 5, 4 2016; 5  No other deadlines or dates set forth in the operative Scheduling Order 6 issued on May 13, 2016 (Dkt. No. 69) shall be altered or otherwise 7 affected by this Order. 8 9 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 Dated: June 17, 2016 ________________________ 12 Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam United States District Judge A P RO F E SSIO NAL C O RPO RATIO N 13 M ILLER L AW G ROUP 14 C ALIF O RNIA 15 16 4830-0069-2274, v. 1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND REQUEST Case No.: C 15-02190 HSG (SK)