Mershon v. Colvin

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01840

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO INFORM COURT REGARDING CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 6/1/15.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 PAMELA JOYCE MERSHON, 10 Plaintiff, No. C 15-01840 JSW 11 v. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 12 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF Social Security, TO INFORM COURT 13 REGARDING CONSENT TO Defendant. MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL 14 / PURPOSES 15 16 In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to 17 reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final 18 judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). The Court has received notice of such consent from 19 Defendant. Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to advise the Court, no later than June 20 15, 2015, as to whether she consents to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings 21 in the instant action. For the parties' convenience, consent forms are available at 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the "Forms" section.1 The parties are further advised that they 2 may jointly request assignment to a specific magistrate judge. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: June 1, 2015 JEFFREY S. WHITE 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the Court in their joint case management statement filed in connection with a case management conference. 28 Because the instant action involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case management conference has not been scheduled. 2