National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers v. United States Department of Justice et al

District of Columbia, dcd-1:2004-cv-00697

MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on 11/3/2006.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA N0V - 5 đua NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS, NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON, CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT: Plaintiff, wuuuuuuuuu v. Civil Action No. 04-0697 (PLF) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On September 8, 2006, this Court issued an opinion and accompanying order denying plaințiff's motion for partial summary judgment [#52], granting plaintiff's supplemental motion for summary judgment as to certain claims [#65] and deferring a ruling on others; and granting defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment on certain claims [#62] and deferring ruling on the remaining claims. As to the deferred claims, the Court directed the defendants to submit for in camera review the remaining contested documents, Document Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 7. The Court has now reviewed those documents and will direct the production of certain information set forth in the accompanying order. The Court has concluded that those documents Defendants were also directed to clarify whether 33 withheld pages were a part of the documents at issue and whether two records were released in full or in part. See Op. at 11. Defendants have complied with this directive through the Supplemental Declaration of John H. Boseker. or portions of documents that it is ordering the government to disclose are not exempt under any of the FOIA exemptions invoked by the defendants in this case. - All issues in this case now having been decided, the Court will enter judgment in part for the plaintiff and in part for the defendants. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. مسار V PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge ... DATE: DATE: 1 | 3/06