Nichols v. Buckles et al

District of Columbia, dcd-1:2003-cv-01831

ORDER and JUDGMENT denying {{47}} plaintiff's motion requesting an emergency hearing regarding her request for injuntive relif, denying {{19}} plaintiff's motion for permanent injunctive relief, granting {{21}} defendant's motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, granting {{21}} motion for summary judgment, and denying as moot {{26}} defendant's motion to stay the filing of its response to plaintiff's first request for production; this case is dismissed from the court docket. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on March 30, 2006.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________) BARBARA A. NICHOLS,)) Plaintiff,)) v.) Civil Action No. 03-1831 (PLF)) CARL J. TRUSCOTT, Director,) Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms) and Explosives, et al.,1)) Defendants.) __________________________________________) ORDER AND JUDGMENT For the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby ORDERED that [21] Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, is GRANTED; it is FURTHER ORDERED that [19] Plaintiff's Motion for Permanent Injunctive Relief is DENIED; it is FURTHER ORDERED that [26] Defendant's Motion to Stay the Filing of its Response to Plaintiff's First Request for Production is DENIED as moot; it is FURTHER ORDERED that [47] Plaintiff's Motion Requesting an Emergency Hearing Regarding her Request for Injunctive Relief is DENIED; it is FURTHER ORDERED that JUDGMENT is entered for defendants on Counts I, IV, V and VI of plaintiff's second amended complaint; it is 1 ATF Director Carl J. Truscott has been substituted for Bradley A. Buckles as the named defendant under Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. FURTHER ORDERED that Counts II, III, VII, and VIII are DISMISSED; it is FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED from the docket of this Court; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that this Order and Judgment shall constitute a FINAL JUDGMENT in this case. This is a final appealable order. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a). SO ORDERED. /s/__________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: March 30, 2006 2