Packnett v. Alvarez et al

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01229

**** ATTACHMENT IS NOT FOR THIS CASE. DOCKETED IN THIS CASE IN ERROR. SEE DKT. NO. 80 FOR CORRECT ENTRY*** ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR A SEVENTH EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A COMPLETE OPPOSITION by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting {{47}} Motion for Summary Judgment; denying {{77}} Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Modified on 9/21/2017 Modified on 9/21/2017

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LAMONT PUCKETT, 7 Case No. 16-cv-05878-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, 8 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S v. REQUEST FOR SECOND EXTENSION 9 OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO JAMIE CORTES, et al., DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE 10 MOTION Defendants. 11 12 Plaintiff has filed a request for a second extension of time in which to file his opposition to Northern District of California United States District Court 13 Defendants' dispositive motion. Having read and considered Plaintiff's request, and good cause 14 appearing, 15 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for a second extension of time is 16 GRANTED. The time in which Plaintiff may file his opposition to Defendants' dispositive 17 motion will be extended up to and including twenty-eight (28) days from the date of this Order. 18 Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after the date Plaintiff's 19 opposition is filed. 20 This Order terminates Docket No. 27. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS 23 United States District Court Judge 24 25 26 27 28