Patricia H Mintz v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. et al

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01924

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting {{19}} Stipulation selecting Private ADR. Modified on 7/22/2015 to correct entry to state Private ADR

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PATRICIA H. MINTZ, CASE NO. 15-CV-1924-HSG Plaintiff, v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC., et al., Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: x Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The parties have agreed to private mediation, to be provided by Kathy Yanni at JAMS or another mutually agreed upon provider. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) x other requested deadline __October 9, 2015____ Dated: July 21, 2015 /s/ Lisa S. Serebin_____________ Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: July 21, 2015 /s/ Michelle M. Scannell________ Attorney for Defendant CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained by each of the other signatories. Dated: July 21, 2015 /s/ Lisa S. Serebin_____________ Attorney for Plaintiff [PROPOSED] ORDER X The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 7/22/2015 __________________________________ Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2