Patton-Bey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al

District of Columbia, dcd-1:2004-cv-00108

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James Robertson on December 6, 2005.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LOU PATTON-BEY,:: Plaintiff,:: v.: Civil Action No. 04-108 (JR): FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.,:: Defendants.: MEMORANDUM In this action brought under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, plaintiff accuses the Bureau of Prisons of providing "an incomplete, erroneous progress report" to the United States Parole Commission. Complaint at 3. He accuses the Parole Commission of unlawfully relying on the report in "render[ing] an adverse determination to retard/rescind [his] . . . parole release date" of December 16, 2003. Id. Plaintiff seeks monetary damages and his release from incarceration. Defendants move to dismiss or for summary judgment. In order to recover damages under the Privacy Act, plaintiff must first invalidate the challenged portion of the sentence. This he cannot do except through a writ of habeas corpus. See White v. United States Probation Office, 148 F.3d 1124, 1126 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (applying Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994)). The writ of habeas corpus also is the exclusive remedy for seeking release from custody. Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973). Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum. JAMES ROBERTSON United States District Judge