Perez et al v. John Muir Health

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01792

ORDER REGARDING {{71}} MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON {{70}} MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND {{73}} MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER. Reset Deadlines/Hearings Re {{70}} MOTION for Summary Judgment : Responses due by 5/26/2016; Replies due by 6/2/2016; Motion Hearing set for 6/16/2016 02:00 PM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/2/2016 03:00 PM; Jury Selection / Jury Trial (10-day) set for 8/22/2016 08:30 AM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 4/18/2016.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARLENE PEREZ, et al., 7 Case No. 15-cv-01792-HSG Plaintiffs, 8 ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO v. CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION 9 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JOHN MUIR HEALTH, et al., MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING 10 ORDER Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 71, 73 12 Northern District of California United States District Court 13 Pending before the Court are two motions brought by Plaintiffs Marlene Perez and Rosa 14 Cerisano: (1) motion to continue the hearing date on Defendants' motion for summary judgment, 15 Dkt. No. 71, and (2) motion to modify the scheduling order, Dkt. No. 73. The court heard oral 16 argument on the motions on April 14, 2016. 17 As stated on the record during the hearing, the Court sets May 14, 2016, as the deadline by 18 which all discovery must be completed. The parties are ORDERED to fully frame any remaining 19 discovery disputes early enough such that Magistrate Judge James can resolve all disputes, and all 20 discovery can be completed, prior to the May 14, 2016, deadline. This is the parties' 21 responsibility: waiting until near the deadline to bring issues to Judge James's attention will not 22 excuse a failure to fully complete discovery by May 14. Further, absent extraordinary 23 circumstances, the parties are precluded from raising any new discovery disputes that were not 24 brought to Judge James's attention prior to the March 29, 2016, deadline to bring motions to 25 compel. 26 The parties shall not issue any further written discovery in this action. 27 Plaintiffs seek to reopen three depositions and take one additional deposition in excess of 28 the ten deposition limit. Dkt. No. 73 at 5. Plaintiffs are not permitted to reopen or notice the four 1 depositions in dispute absent prior leave from Judge James. 2 The remainder of the scheduling order is as follows: 3 4 Event Date Deadline to File Oppositions to Dispositive May 26, 2016 5 Motions 6 Deadline to File Replies in Support of Dispositive June 2, 2016 Motions 7 Deadline to Exchange Initial Expert Reports June 13, 2016 Deadline for Hearing on Dispositive Motion June 16, 2016 — 2:00 p.m. 8 Expert Discovery Cutoff June 24, 2016 9 Pretrial Conference August 2, 2016 — 3:00 p.m. Jury Trial August 22, 2016 — 8:30 10 a.m. / 10 days 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Northern District of California United States District Court 13 Dated: 4/18/2016 14 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 15 United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2