Peskoff v. Faber

District of Columbia, dcd-1:2004-cv-00526

ORDER granting in part and denying in part {{31}} Motion for Protective Order, granting in part and denying in part {{15}} Motion for Protective Order, granting {{16}} Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery, granting {{20}} Motion for Discovery, denying as moot {{21}} Motion, granting nunc pro tunc {{24}} Motion for Protective Order, granting nunc pro tunc {{25}} Motion for Protective Order, granting in part and denying in part {{27}} Motion for Protective Order. Discovery is extended until August 19, 2005 solely for the purposes of complying with this Order and Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 7/22/2005. (lcjf1,)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JONATHAN E. PESKOFF, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 04-526 (HHK/JMF) MICHAEL A. FABER, Defendant. ORDER Pursuant to the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the following is hereby ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Motion for Protective Order Concerning Plaintiff's Subpeona to United Bank for Defendant's Personal Bank Records [#15] is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. 2. Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order and Supporting Memorandum Concerning Plaintiff's Subpeona to Non-Party Mark Levine [#27] is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. 3. Defendant's Motion and Supporting Memorandum Requesting Entry of a Protective Order Governing the Confidentiality of Discovery Materials [#31] is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. 4. Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order Concerning Defendant's Subpeona Duces Tecum to Joseph Estabrook [#24] is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. 5. Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order Concerning Defendant's Subpeona Duces Tecum and Ad Testificandum to Joel Lesch [#25] is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. 6. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Discovery Period and Corresponding Modification of Scheduling Order [#16] is GRANTED. The Court extends the discovery deadline to August 19, 2005 solely for the purposes of complying with this Order and the accompanying Opinion. 7. Plaintiff's Motion for Additional Depositions [#20] is GRANTED. 8. Plaintiff's Consent Motion for Telephonic Conference Prior to Filing Motions to Compel Discovery [#21] is DENIED as moot. SO ORDERED. ___________________________ JOHN M. FACCIOLA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: July 22, 2005