Progress Rail Services v. Western Heritage Credit Union

District of Nebraska, ned-8:2005-cv-00098

ORDER regarding {{89}} Motion for Expedited Hearing on Rule 45 Subpoena. The plaintiff shall have to on or before December 11, 2006, to file aresponse regarding issuance of the third-party subpoena to Deloitte & Touche. Western Heritage shall have to on or before December 14, 2006, to file areply. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

8:05-cv-00098-JFB-TDT Doc # 95 Filed: 12/04/06 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 835 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PROGRESS RAIL SERVICES) CORPORATION,)) Plaintiff,) 8:05CV98) vs.) ORDER) WESTERN HERITAGE CREDIT UNION) and DAVID G. BRADFORD,)) Defendants.) This matter is before the court on the defendant Western Heritage Credit Union's (Western Heritage) Motion for Expedited Hearing on Rule 45 Subpoena (Filing No. 89). Western Heritage seeks resolution of the plaintiff's objection to a third-party subpoena in time for Western Heritage to serve the subpoena and receive documents prior to its expert disclosure deadline of January 2, 2007. Under the circumstances the court will impose a truncated briefing schedule. Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The plaintiff shall have to on or before December 11, 2006, to file a response regarding issuance of the third-party subpoena to Deloitte & Touche. 2. Western Heritage shall have to on or before December 14, 2006, to file a reply. DATED this 4th day of December, 2006. BY THE COURT: s/Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge