Robert E. Renzel Trust et al v. Ventura et al

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01648

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER, granting {{104}}. Signed by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte on 6/22/2016.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 Bret A. Stone SBN 190161 Kirk M. Tracy SBN 288508 2 PALADIN LAW GROUP® LLP 3 1176 Boulevard Way Walnut Creek, CA 94595 4 Telephone: (925) 947-5700 Facsimile: (925) 935-8488 5 Counsel for Estate of Robert Renzel, Deceased, by and through his 6 successors in interest, Susan Carter and Ann Renzel Sebastian; 7 Robert E. Renzel Trust, by and through its trustees, Susan Carter and Ann Renzel Sebastian; Susan Carter; Ann Renzel Sebastian; 8 and Bascom Avenue Development LLC 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ESTATE OF ROBERT RENZEL, Case No. 5:15-cv-1648-RMW 12 DECEASED et al., [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER 14 v. Case Management Conference: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte 15 ESTATE OF LUPE VENTURA, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor DECEASED, et al., June 17, 2016 16 10:30 a.m. Defendants. 17 Action filed: April 10, 2015 18 Discovery cut-off: none set AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. Trial date: none set 19 20 21 On June 17, 2016, a Case Management Conference was held in the above-referenced 22 Court. Appearances were made by Attorneys Kirk M. Tracy (Renzel), Robert Farrell (Renzel), 23 Stephan Choo (Whangs), Ann A. Nguyen (Thu Huynh and Ngoc Tran), and Santino Tropea 24 (Torres) who participated telephonically via courtcall. Uktae Han (pro se) also appeared on behalf 25 of himself and Mija Han. 26 The Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows: 27 A further Case Management Conference shall take place on September 30, 2016 at 10:30 28 a.m. in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before the Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. The Court expects [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1 that, prior to the September 30, 2016 case management conference: (1) environmental 2 investigation of the subject property shall be completed; (2) issues regarding cost-sharing 3 agreements for investigation will have been resolved; and (3) the matter will be ready for 4 mediation. If any of these items have not been done, the parties are to file a statement explaining 5 why those items have not been done. 6 If the Whangs and their insurance carrier cannot resolve insurance issues between them, 7 Renzel may proceed with a motion for summary judgment against Whangs, prior to the 8 September 30, 2016 case management conference, on the issue of express indemnity, duty to 9 defend, and hold harmless, pursuant to the lease(s) between Whangs and Renzel. 10 Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 16-10(d), a Joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be 11 filed no later than September 23, 2016. 12 Counsel for Renzel is ordered to provide notice. 13 IT IS SO ORDERED: 14 15 DATED: June 22, 2016 ___________________________________ 16 United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- Case No. 5:15-cv-1648-RMW [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER