Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Hudson Specialty Insurance Company

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-02896

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting {{48}} Stipulation to Allow Hudson Specialty Insurance Company to Amend Responses to Requests for Admission.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 STEPHEN M. HAYES (SBN 83583) shayes@hayesscott.com 2 STEPHEN P. ELLINGSON (SBN 136505) sellingson@hayesscott.com 3 JONATHAN K. MYERS (SBN 306756) jmyers@hayesscott.com 4 HAYES SCOTT BONINO ELLINGSON & McLAY, LLP 203 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 480 5 Redwood City, California 94065 Telephone: 650.637.9100 6 Facsimile: 650.637.8071 7 Attorneys for Defendant HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO. 8 JAMES R. TENERO (SBN 201023) 9 jtenero@selmanlaw.com I O WENDY M. SCHENK (SBN 177397) wschenk@selmanlaw.com 11 SELMAN BREITMAN LLP 33 New Montgomery, Sixth Floor 12 San Francisco, California 94105-4537 Telephone: 415.979.0400 13 Facsimile: 415.979.2099 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff 15 Scottsdale Insurance Company 16 UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 20 SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, a CASE NO. 3:15-cv-02896-HSG corporation 21 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] Plaintiff, ORDER TO ALLOW HUDSON 22 SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. TO AMEND RESPONSES TO 23 REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE 24 COMPANY, a corporation 25~------------~D~e~fu~n~d~an~t~·--------__J 26 27 28 741921 STIPULATION & (PROPOSED) ORDER TO ALLOW HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY TO AMEND RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION- CASE NO. 3:15-cv-02896-HSG 1 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 Having met and conferred with respect to the matters set forth herein, plaintiff Scottsdale 3 Insurance Company ("Scottsdale") and defendant Hudson Specialty Insurance Company ("Hudson"), 4 referred to collectively as the "Parties," by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and 5 agree as follows: I. 6 RECITALS 7 1. WHEREAS, Scottsdale propounded requests for admission to Hudson and Hudson 8 served responses. 9 2. WHEREAS, Hudson recently became aware of the need to revise responses to 10 Scottsdale's requests for admission, request nos. 3 and 5. 11 3. WHEREAS, the parties hereby agree and stipulate to a Court order to allow Hudson 12 to revise its responses to Scottsdale's requests for admission, request nos. 3 and 5. 13 II. 14 STIPULATION 15 Scottsdale and Hudson hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 16 1. The Parties agree to a Court order to allow Hudson to revise its responses to 17 Scottsdale's requests for admission, request nos. 3 and 5. 18 19 Dated: December 5, 2016 SELMAN BREITMAN LLP 20 21 By l)f &k~ JAMES R. TENER 22 WENDY M. SCHENK Attorneys for Plaintiff 23 SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY 24 25 26 27 28 741921 -1- STIPULATION & jPROPOSED) ORDER TO ALLOW HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY TO AMEND RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION- CASE NO.3: 15-cv-02896-HSG Dated: December 5, 2016 HA fi1.S TT BONINO ELLINGSON & McLAY, LLP /1 ~ G/ _.---·· 2 By. 3. STEPHEN M. HAYES STEPHEN P. ELLINGSON 4 JONATHAN K. MYERS Attorneys for Defendant 5 HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY 6 7 [PROPOSED] ORDER 8 Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Court hereby orders as follows: 9 10 1. Hudson is allowed to serve revised responses to Scottsdale's requests for admission, II request nos. 3 and 5. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 Dated: December 6, 2016 15 By__~~~~~~~~~~~~~~----- 16 HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 741921 -2- STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ALLOW HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY TO AMEND RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION- CASE NO. 3:15-cv-02896-HSG