Sherry Singer et al v. Postmates, Inc.

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01284

ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS AND PERMITTING BRIEF SUR-REPLY re {{48}} Objection. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/17/16.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 UNITED D STATES D DISTRICT C COURT 5 NORTHER RN DISTRIC CT OF CALIIFORNIA 6 7 SH HERRY SIN NGER, et al., Case No. 115-cv-012844-JSW Plaintiffs, 8 ORDER RREQUIRING G RESPON NSE TO v. OBJECTIIONS AND PERMITTIING 9 BRIEF SU UR-REPLY 10 PO OSTMATES S INC., Re: Dockett No. 48 Defendant.. 11 12 Northern District of California United States District Court 13 Defend dants have ob bjected to ev vidence that P Plaintiffs suubmitted withh the reply bbrief in 14 sup pport of theirr motion for notice to bee issued to siimilarly situaated employyees, which iis under 15 sub bmission. Th he Court HE EREBY ORD DERS Plainttiffs to file a response too the objectioons by no 16 lateer than Febru uary 24, 201 16, which shall not exceeed five (5) ppages. 17 It is FU URTHER OR RDERED thaat the Court shall permitt Postmates tthe opportunnity at this 18 tim me to submit a brief sur-rreply respond ding to the nnewly submiitted evidencce, in the eveent the Court 19 oveerrules the objections o to the evidence, either in w whole or in ppart. That suur-reply alsoo shall not 20 excceed five (5)) pages and shall s be due on March 2,, 2016. If thhe Court susttains Postmaates' 21 objjections to th he evidence, it shall not consider c thee arguments rraised in thee sur-reply. 22 IT IS SO S ORDER RED. 23 Daated: Februaary 17, 2016 24 25 JE EFFREY S. W WHITE 26 Unnited States D District Judgge 27 28