Singleton v. 13th Circuit Court Judges et al

Middle District of Florida, flmd-8:2017-cv-00564

ORDER denying pro se plaintiff's construed motions {{22}} and {{23}}. Signed by Judge James D. Whittemore on 8/19/2019. (AKA)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

PageID 790 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION TREECE A. SINGLETON, Plaintiff, Case No: 8:17-CV-564-T-27AAS 13TH CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES, SUNSHINE STATE INSURANCE CORP, SCHWARTZ LAW GROUP, PA and MORGAN & MORGAN LAW, Defendants. ORDER BEFORE THE COURT are two construed motions (Dkts. 22, 23) filed by pro se Plaintiff subsequent to this Court's Order denying Plaintiff's motions to vacate judgment and for the undersigned to be recused (See Dkt. 21). In Dkt. 22, Plaintiff "moves the court for a correct determination of his indigent (sic) and eligible (sic) for the provision of due process services."(Dkt. 22 at p. 6). Construed liberally, Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of this Court's Order (Dkt. 17) that denied as moot his request to proceed in forma pauperis. Upon consideration, Plaintiff's construed motion (Dkt. 22) is DENIED for the same reasons his previous motion was denied. (See Dkt. 17). In Dkt. 23, Plaintiff seeks to file an amended complaint (Dkt. 23 at p. 25). The case however was dismissed with prejudice on October 6, 2017. Since there is no active pending case, Plaintiff's construed motion (Dkt. 23) seeking to file an amended complaint is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 19 day of August, 2019. Otitis JAMES D. WHILTEMORE United States District Judge Copies to: Pro se Plaintiff