Taylor v. C6 Disposal Systems, Inc.

Western District of Texas, txwd-5:2019-cv-00347

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to {{14}} Opposed MOTION to Quash Defendant's Subpoena Duces TecumOpposed MOTION for Protective Order by C6 DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, INC.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION CHARLES TAYLOR, § Individually and on behalf of all § others similarly situated § § PLAINTIFF, § § v. § CIV. ACTION NO. 5:19-CV-00347-ESC § C6 DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, INC., § DEFENDANT. § § UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH S. CHESTNEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: NOW COMES C6 Disposal Systems, Inc., Defendant in the above-styled and numbered cause, and respectfully files this Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum and Motion for Protective Order, and for cause would show the Court the following: 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum and Motion for Protective Order (Doc. 14) was filed on June 18, 2019. The deadline for Defendant to respond to such Motion to Quash and Motion for Protective Order is thus June 25, 2019. 2. Defendant seeks additional time to assess and respond to the above- referenced Motion filed by Plaintiff, as Defendant's counsel will be on vacation from June 21, 2019 to June 25, 2019 and therefore will not be able to research, draft and file this Response prior to the current deadline. 3. Defendant therefore seeks a one (1) day extension of the deadline to file its Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum and Motion for 1 Protective Order. Defendant's new deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum and Motion for Protective Order would therefore be June 26, 2019. Such an extension will not meaningfully delay resolution of this case, will not prejudice any of the parties, and will allow the hearing on this matter set on June 27, 2019 to go forward as scheduled. CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE Defendant's counsel has conferred with counsel for Plaintiff Charles Taylor, who does not oppose the relief sought in this Motion. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant requests that this Motion be granted, and that the Court grant it such further relief, in law or in equity, to which it may be entitled. Respectfully submitted, Riley & Riley, Attorneys at Law By: /s/ Charles Riley CHARLES RILEY State Bar No. 24039138 320 Lexington Avenue San Antonio, Texas 78215 Telephone: (210) 225-7236 Facsimile: (210) 227-7907 Attorney for Defendant 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on the 20th day of June, 2019 a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served on the following in the manner indicated: Clif Alexander Via CM/ECF ANDERSON ALEXANDER, PLLC 819 N. Upper Broadway Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 clif@a2xlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Charles Riley CHARLES RILEY 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION CHARLES TAYLOR, § Individually and on behalf of all § others similarly situated § § PLAINTIFF, § § v. § CIV. ACTION NO. 5:19-CV-00347-ESC § C6 DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, INC., § DEFENDANT. § § ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER CAME ON to be heard Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum and Motion for Protective Order. After reviewing the Motion and noting the lack of opposition, the Court finds that it should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum and Motion for Protective Order is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendant to file such response is extended to June 26, 2019. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this _____ day of June 2019. HONORABLE ELIZABETH S. CHESTNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4