Toufighjou v. Tritschler

Middle District of Florida, flmd-8:2016-cv-01709

ORDER: United States Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # {{39}}) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.(2)Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Doc. # {{25}}) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is specifically awarded $15,554.25 in attorneys' fees, $1,584 in costs, $4,732.02 in Plaintiff's expenses, and $1,343.83 in expenses for Plaintiff's counsel. The total award amounts to $23,214.10. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 10/18/2016. (KAK)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

PageID 364 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ARSALAN TOUFIGHJOU, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:16-cv-1709-T-33JSS RACHEL TRITSCHLER, Defendant. ________________________________/ ORDER This matter is before the Court on consideration of United States Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 39), filed on September 30, 2016, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Doc. # 25) be granted in the total amount of $23,214.10. Defendant, who is proceeding pro se at this juncture, had the opportunity to file an objection to the Report and Recommendation, but declined to do so. The time for Defendant to file an objection has now elapsed. As discussed below, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Discussion After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and PageID 365 recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994). The Report and Recommendation thoroughly and thoughtfully addresses the issues presented and, after conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) United States Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 39) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. 2 PageID 366 (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Doc. # 25) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is specifically awarded $15,554.25 in attorneys' fees, $1,584 in costs, $4,732.02 in Plaintiff's expenses, and $1,343.83 in expenses for Plaintiff's counsel. The total award amounts to $23,214.10. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 18th day of October, 2016. 3