USA v. Ford
Criminal

District of Nebraska, ned-8:2004-cr-00203-32021

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION PURSUANT TO 18:3582(c)(2) - granting {{52}} motion to reduce sentence pursuant to crack cocaine Amendment 706. The defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judg ment issued) of 84 months is reduced to 67 months. Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgments dated 4/15/2005 and 2/16/2007 shall remain in effect. Effective date: 4/17/2008 as to Christopher A. Ford (1). Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (4 Certified copies to USM)(JAB,)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

8:04-cr-00203-RGK-CRZ Doc # 57 Filed: 04/17/08 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 179 AO 247 (02/08) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,) 8:04CR203 Plaintiff,)) v.) USM No: 19561-047) CHRISTOPHER A. FORD) DANA C. BRADFORD Defendant.) Defendant's Attorney Date of previous judgments: 2/16/2007 & 4/15/2005) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Upon motion of the defendant under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of 84 months is reduced to 67 months. I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures) Previous Offense Level: 33 Amended Offense Level: 31 Criminal History Category: VI Criminal History Category: VI Previous Guideline Range: 235 to 293 months Amended Guideline Range: 188 to 235 months II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.  The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range.  Other (explain): In addition to the Rule 35 reduction, the court previously departed to Criminal History IV. III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgments dated February 16, 2007 and April 15, 2005 shall remain in effect. Filing 52 is granted as provided herein. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 17th day of April, 2008 Effective Date: April 17, 2008 S/Richard G. Kopf United States District Judge