USA v. Gochenour
Criminal

District of Nebraska, ned-8:2004-cr-00204-31650

TENTATIVE FINDINGS OF FACT regarding Third Revised Presentence Investigation Report as to defendant Gary Dean Gochenour. It is ordered that: (1) The defendant's motion for departure or deviation (variance) {{86}} will be resolved at sentencing. (2) Except to the extent (if at all) that I have reserved an issue for later resolution in the preceding paragraph, the parties are herewith notified that my tentative findings are that the presentence report is correct in all respects. ETC. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

8:04-cr-00204-RGK-CRZ Doc # 87 Filed: 01/23/07 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 316 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,)) Case No. 8:04CR204 Plaintiff,)) vs.) TENTATIVE) FINDINGS GARY DEAN GOCHENOUR,)) Defendant.) I am in receipt of the third revised presentence investigation report in this case. Except for the defendant's motion for departure or deviation (variance), there are no objections or motions for departure or variance. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The undersigned will consult and follow the Guidelines to the extent permitted and required by United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). In this regard, the undersigned gives notice that, unless otherwise ordered, he will (a) give the advisory Guidelines substantial weight; (b) resolve all factual disputes relevant to sentencing by the greater weight of the evidence and without the aid of a jury; (c) impose upon the government the burden of proof on all Guideline-enhancements; (d) impose upon the defendant the burden of proof on all Guideline-mitigators; (e) depart from the advisory Guidelines, if appropriate, using pre-Booker departure theory; and (f) in cases where a departure using pre-Booker departure theory is not warranted, deviate or vary from the Guidelines only when there is a plainly superior, principled reason which justifies a sentence different than that called for by application of the advisory Guidelines. (2) The defendant's motion for departure or deviation (variance) (filing 86) will be resolved at sentencing. 8:04-cr-00204-RGK-CRZ Doc # 87 Filed: 01/23/07 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 317 (3) Except to the extent (if at all) that I have reserved an issue for later resolution in the preceding paragraph, the parties are herewith notified that my tentative findings are that the presentence report is correct in all respects. (4) If any party wishes to challenge these tentative findings, said party shall, as soon as possible, but in any event at least five (5) business days before sentencing, file in the court file and serve upon opposing counsel and the court a motion challenging these tentative findings, supported by (a) such evidentiary materials as are required (giving due regard to the requirements of the local rules of practice respecting the submission of evidentiary materials), (b) a brief as to the law and (c) if an evidentiary hearing is requested, a statement describing why an evidentiary hearing is necessary and how long such a hearing would take. (5) Absent submission of the information required by the preceding paragraph of this order, my tentative findings may become final and the presentence report may be adopted and relied upon by me without more. (6) Unless otherwise ordered, any motion challenging these tentative findings shall be resolved at sentencing. January 23, 2007. BY THE COURT: s/ Richard G. Kopf United States District Judge -2-