USA v. Prayer
Criminal

District of Nebraska, ned-8:2004-cr-00440-32916

ORDER - The motion to continue trial {{27}} is granted. Trial of this matter is re-scheduled for 5/14/07, before Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. The time between 3/20/07 and 5/14/07 shall be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act. Jury Trial set for 5/14/2007 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (Omaha) before Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon as to defendant Brandon E. Prayer. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

8:04-cr-00440-JFB-FG3 Doc # 29 Filed: 03/20/07 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 57 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,)) 8:04CR440 Plaintiff,)) vs.) ORDER) BRANDON E. PRAYER,)) Defendant.) This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Brandon E. Prayer (Prayer) (Filing No. 27). Prayer seeks a continuance of the trial scheduled for April 9, 2007. Prayer's counsel represents that counsel for the government has no objection to the motion. Prayer has submitted an affidavit in accordance with paragraph 9 of the progression order whereby Prayer consents to the motion and acknowledges he understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act (Filing No. 28). Upon consideration, the motion will be granted. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Prayer's motion to continue trial (Filing No. 27) is granted. 2. Trial of this matter is re-scheduled for May 14, 2007, before Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between March 20, 2007 and May 14, 2007, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason that defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B). DATED this 20th day of March, 2007. BY THE COURT: s/Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge